Empirical Testing for Weak Form Hypothesis of Emerging Capital Markets: A Comparative study of Jordan’s ASE and Turkey’s BORSA IST
|Author(s)||by Abdul Aziz Farid Saymeh|
|Keywords||EMH-Weak form, Random walk hypothesis. Jordan Stock Exchange, Turkey Stock Exchange,|
|Open Access||Access PDF Open in New Tab|
The purpose of the study is to empirically test the Weak Efficient Form Hypothesis for two emerging stock markets, which are: Amman Stock Exchange, (ASE) and Turkish Stock Exchange (BORSA Istanbul) through examining their monthly indexes for the period 2000-2011. The study is an empirical test to study the effect of historical information in predicting the future stock prices of the two stock markets. Data used in the empirical analysis were collected from historical records of ASE and BORSA Istanbul markets for the period 2000-2011.Tests used were: Ljung Box Autocorrelation ,Runs , Dickey-Fuller Unit Root , and Individual Variance Ratio tests. The results of the study indicated debatable results. Runs tests have rejected the Random Walk characteristics while Augmented Dickey-Fuller tests have approved that both markets are weak form efficient. Autocorrelation tests have rejected the Random Walk Hypothesis for both markets; However, Variance Ratio tests have revealed mixed results as they approved BORSA Istanbul and rejected ASE as being Weak Form Efficient. Based on these test results, there were not enough evidences to consider ASE and BORSA Istanbul as Weak Form Efficient markets. The data were confined to ASE and BORSA Istanbul only, therefore, researcher is unable to generalize results to all emerging markets as the settings of other countries are questionable; Also it is worth to say that this research opens the door for future research opportunities, which can be done by the following ways: Further testing of other countries stock markets which will help mitigate the issue of generalizing conclusions on other stock markets. Comparative studies amongst emerging capital markets shall be highly inevitable. This research has offered a significant empirical contribution to the literature regarding the emerging stock market performance and efficiency. The research results might help both academicians and practitioners to be more acquainted by the components of ASE and BORSA Istanbul stock markets to have more insight in other developing markets. The current research may be considered as a pioneer study that highlighted the effect of historical information on future stock prices of two emerging markets. It could be also an initiative study that will generalize this effect on other emerging markets. Finally, the results can provide a reference for further researches about Weak Form Efficiency.
ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE
Online Publication & Two Hard Copies
|International Journal of Empirical Finance||$ 100||$ 170|
|International Journal of Financial Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|International Journal of Management Sciences||$ 100||$ 170|
|Journal of Empirical Economics||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Education and Literature||$ 60||$ 130|
|Quarterly Journal of Business Studies||$ 50||$ 120|
|Journal of Language and Communication||$ 30||$ 100|
|Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities||$ 80||$ 150|
|Journal of Social Economics||$ 30||$ 100|
|International Journal of Financial Markets||$ 30||$ 100|
|Journal of Public Policy & Governance||$ 30||$ 100|
For a peer-reviewed journal, the publication of articles plays an essential role in the development of a coherent network of knowledge. It is, therefore, essential that all publishers, editors, authors, and reviewers, in the process of publishing the journals, conduct themselves in accordance with the highest level of professional ethics and standards. The publisher is dedicated to supporting the vast efforts of the editors, the academic contributions of authors, and the respected volunteer work undertaken by reviewers. The publisher is also responsible for ensuring that the publication system works smoothly, and that ethical guidelines are applied to assist the editor, author, and reviewer in performing their ethical duties.
The editor has the following responsibilities:
1.The editor should acknowledge receipt of submitted manuscripts within two working days of receipt and ensure an efficient, fair, and timely review process.
2.The editor should ensure that submitted manuscripts are processed in a confidential manner, and that no content of the manuscripts will be disclosed to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
3.The editor should recuse himself or herself from processing manuscripts if he or she has any conflict of interest with any of the authors or institutions related to the manuscripts.
4.The editor should not disclose the names and other details of the reviewers to a third party without the permission of the reviewers.
5.The editor has the right to make the final decision on whether to accept or reject a manuscript with reference to the significance, originality, and clarity of the manuscript and its relevance to the journal.
6.The editor should by no means make any effort to oblige the authors to cite his or her journal either as an implied or explicit condition of accepting their manuscripts for publication.
7.The editor should not use for his or her own research any part of any data or work reported in submitted and as yet unpublished articles.
8.The editor should respond promptly and take reasonable measures when an ethical complaint occurs concerning a submitted manuscript or a published paper, and the editor should immediately contact and consult with the author. In this case, a written formal retraction or correction may also be required.